RSS Feed

Feminist Intensive–Day One Overview

Last week I attended Soapbox’s Feminist Intensive for staff and faculty.  This event is normally run for 5 days for students in January and June called Feminist Boot Camp.  Soapbox is a feminist speakers bureau I have used since they began.  It was founded by writers & activists Amy Richards and Jennifer Baumgardner.  They are the authors of Manifesta:  Young Women, Feminism and the Future, which is an excellent book I have used in many of my classes. 
Each day we met with activists and of feminist organizations in NYC.  On the first day we met with Equality Now ‘s Global Director, Yasmeen Hassan.  This 20 year old organization focuses on four areas:  Discrimination in Law, Sexual Violence, Female Genital Mutilation and Trafficking.  Their mission is to achieve legal and systemic change that addresses violence and discrimination against women and girls around the world.  They have offices in NYC, Nairobi, and London with plans to expand.  The work specifically with organizations in the countries where a woman is in need of help, to provide legal and other support. 
You can join the organization and get on their Take Action list.  Equality Now
We ended up next for lunch at the home of Joanne Sandler. She is a consultant on women’s issues worldwide.  She was the Executive Director for UNIFEM and had a role in creating a space for women at the United Nations.  She talked with us about the difficulty in getting the UN to understand the importance of women.  What sticks with me about her conversation with “we got what we asked for.”  She meant that women have gotten to part of patriarchal institutions but we need to now take it a step further.  She also spoke of having younger women step in to lead feminist organizations and that it is time for her generation to allow for that space.
We spent our next meeting with Women’s World Banking’s VP of Development Jane Sloane.  Women’ s World Banking “is a non-profit, microfinance institution, consisting of 39 financial organizations in 27 countries, providing low-income women access to financial services and information. WWB helps microfinance institutions move away from a strictly credit-led approach toward providing a broader array of financial products and service, including savings and insurance to help the poor build comprehensive financial safety nets.”  We learned a great deal about micro-finance and financial investing with a “gender lens.”  What this means is looking not only at what companies do, but how they treat their employees, for example, investing in a company that has equal pay for its female workers.

We ended our first long day at a restaurant in Brooklyn with Robin Morgan and Irshad Manji.  
“Irshad Manji is a New York Times bestselling author, professor of leadership and advocate of liberal reform within Islam. Irshad directs New York University’s Moral Courage Project, which teaches people worldwide to challenge political correctness, intellectual conformity and self-censorship. As a faithful Muslim, she emphasizes Islam’s own tradition of “ijtihad,” or independent thinking. The Jakarta Post in Indonesia, the world’s biggest Muslim-majority country, identifies Irshad as one of three women making a positive difference in Islam today. Her latest book, Allah, Liberty and Love, is sparking fierce debate internationally.”  She spoke of how a woman was arrested for selling her new book before she had even sold it.  

“Robin Morgan is an award-winning poet, novelist, political theorist, feminist activist,and best-selling author, who has published more than 20 books, including the now-classic anthologies Sisterhood Is Powerful, Sisterhood Is Global, and Sisterhood Is Forever: The Women’s Anthology for A New MillenniumA founder of contemporary US feminism, she has been a leader in the international women’s movement for 25 years. She has traveled–as organizer, lecturer, journalist–across Europe, to Australia, Brazil, the Caribbean, Central America, China, Indonesia, Israel, Japan, Nepal, New Zealand, Pacific Island nations, the Philippines, and South Africa; she has twice spent months in the Palestinian refugee camps in Jordan, Lebanon, Egypt, Syria, West Bank, and Gaza, reporting on the conditions of women. In 1990, as Ms. Editor-in-Chief, she re-launched the magazine as an international, award-winning, ad-free bimonthly. Recently, she co-founded The Women’s Media Center,” where we start day II.  More to come . . . .

    Two in One Week

    I normally try to blog on Wednesdays to be consistent and to hold myself to a schedule.  Yet this week we’ll call “Bonus Extra Blog Week” because I am starting to feel very annoyed with the world as it is.

    I want to start first with the term “girls.”  I recently posted the following link to my facebook The Sexualization of Girls.  And while the whole video is great, I have been thinking a lot about her comment that when we were in college, we wanted to be called “women” and now young adult women want to be called “girls.”  Then I had a work discussion with some male students who could not understand why I felt that showing three videos of drunk women on reality shows was inappropriate for orientation.  I was trying to explain it wasn’t “balanced.”  They didn’t get it.

    I’m normally an optimistic person.  Anyone who knows me  would attest to that, however, all the political fervor against women in terms of reproductive rights, birth control, and equal pay seems to connect too succinctly with not only the way women are represented in television (particularly the horrible reality shows so many of our women and men watch) but also the lack of awareness many young people seem to have of these issues.  For example, why it is important to be called a woman when you are over 18.  No one seems to think it’s weird that we don’t call men boys.  Girls and guys.  Or just guys.  One administrator recently spoke to the new students and called everyone guys.  That’s a whole other issue to save for another date. 

    I believe college is a place to learn about things outside yourself.  It’s a place to have your old belief system challenged.  I wrongly expect that student leaders who are representing our university should be MORE aware than the average student.  And yes, I’m annoyed that in 2012 I now have to spend time trying to “prove” why a certain representation seems to be sexist or racist. And defending the importance of calling women, women. 

    Even the recent HBO, supposedly feminist TV series, Girls has a young female creator who would rather be called girl than woman.  The power of language seems to escape many young people today and I am not so positive I have the will or the energy to fix it.  Maybe if the sun ever comes out I  feel less grim. 

    Against Obama

    This week the Senate blocked the Paycheck Fairness Act.  What we know is that EVERY Senate Republican voted against it.  Gee whiz, that’s bi-partisanism at its best!  From The Huffington Post,

    The Senate failed to secure the 60 votes needed to advance the Paycheck Fairness Act, which would have required employers to demonstrate that any salary differences between men and women doing the same work are not gender-related. The bill also would have prohibited employers from retaliating against employees who share salary information with their co-workers, and would have required the Labor Department to increase its outreach to employers to help eliminate pay disparities.
    The final vote was 52-47, with all Republicans opposing the bill. That included female Sens. Kelly Ayotte (N.H.), Susan Collins (Maine), Kay Bailey Hutchison (Texas), Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) and Olympia Snowe (Maine).

    President Obama said it was “incredibly disappointing” that Republicans would block a bill that would provide equal pay for women.  What he should have said is that it’s “incredibly disappointing” that all the Republicans have on their agenda is not to give up anything that would appear in some way to support the President.  In the last six months of Obama’s first term in office, it is apparent that Congress has become so politicized that they cannot even represent their constituencies.  Are you seriously suggesting to me that ALL the women from Maine who Collins and Snowe represent would have wanted this vote blocked?  I grew up in Maine and I can assure you there are many, many, many women who would appreciate a little government regulation in the equal pay department.  

    For me this is just another example of a politics run amok.  How are we to vote with our conscience if it is clear that our Senators are voting for or against bills just to “give it to the President.”  This type of behavior gets me thinking about revolution and resistance and opposition.  Maybe its time we Occupy the Senate.  If your Senator was one of those who voted against women, please share your concern with them.  Hold their feet to the fire.  And let them know you won’t be checking a box next to their name in November if they keep dismissing the needs of their constituents.   

    The war against women is really a war against Obama.  But for me, throwing women out the window in order to defeat Obama is a pretty shitty strategy.   

    Losing Women

    My life was touched by two women who left this physical world this week.  The first was my step-grandmother, Genny Jones. Grandmother, as many of us called her, took me in as one of her many grandchildren as soon as my step-father married my mother.  She was half Chippewa and spent much of her youth in the traditional BIA Reservation Schools.  She went to work as soon as she could.  After marrying Grandfather, she continued to work, even after having three children.  She de-boned chickens for Campbell’s Soup for much of her life.  After retiring, she took care of the church next to her house, mowing the lawn and keeping up with her garden.  She was a good cook.  She was funny.  She had the most common sense of anyone I had ever met.  She was a woman of few words.  But my step-father, Clinton, was one of the nicest men you will ever meet, so I know she was a great mother.  While many might consider her a traditional working class housewife and mother, I do believe she was ahead of her time, living to the ripe old age of 90. 

    The other woman was my friend and yoga teacher, Stephanie Matson.  I met her by working with her husband.  I started taking her classes and we got to be friends.  Her style of teaching inspired me to commit to my practice in a non-judgmental way.  When she was diagnosed with leukemia a year and a half ago, I tried to help recommend some folks to fill in for her.  One of those people I recommended suggested that I could teach for her.  I talked it over with the Fitness Center Director and we both felt we’d feel more comfortable if I was certified.  I did lots of homework and committed to an expensive and long 7 month 200 hour certification.  She was with me in spirit and on Facebook through the whole process, checking in, encouraging me and being a support. 

    When she was through with the bone marrow transplant, I felt confident she would recover and I would again be her student.  Her remission was far too brief and the process of trying to put her back into remission, so she could attempt a non-donor transplant, was too much for her already compromised system to take. 

    Her death is not so easy to write about.  She was my age.  She had two little boys.  Grandmother had a full long life.  But one thing both of these women taught me is that being true to who you are is the best way to live your life with integrity.  Staying present is the best way to be.  We can’t fear what has not yet come.  We should not dwell in what has passed.  Today I am reminded by them to live fiercely.  Namaste Stephanie and God Bless Grandmother.

    Attack, Attack, Attack.

    I was recently talking with my birth-father about my blog.  I am adopted and found my birth family 15 years ago.  He is very political.  He suggested I address the attacks on reproductive rights at the state level.  He feels the topic isn’t getting enough attention.  I think there is a reason for that.  The patriarchal media tends to focus on national issues, like Obama’s attempt to allow women access to contraception via their health insurance.  If the media doesn’t mention the statewide attacks on women’s right to reproductive freedom, the average citizen will remain unaware and no one will speak up.

    The bottom line is that 17 states have introduced bills that present tighter restrictions to abortion than what is allowed under Roe v. Wade.  The ones that have garnered the most press are these “personhood” bills that give rights to the fetus while in utero.  

    According to the Guttmacher Institute, and as quoted in Daily Kos,

    • Ten states have introduced bills requiring all or some abortion providers to have hospital privileges.  The worst of these has been Mississippi, where the governor signed such a bill that could mean the shutdown of the state’s last remaining abortion clinic before the summer is over.
    • A number of states, including Indiana and Tennessee, have introduced bills that would require   require all medication abortion providers to have hospital privileges at a hospital that is in the same county as the abortion clinic.
    • Five states introduced or passed laws regulating crisis pregnancy centers. After seeing its 2011 law in this regard blocked by court order, South Dakota enacted a new law in March this year that “require[s] that abortion counseling include information on any research showing that some women (based on their ‘physical, psychological, demographic or situational’ characteristics) may be at higher risk of negative mental health outcomes associated with an abortion.
    • Three states have introduced alternatives-to-abortion bills. In Kansas the bill would also prohibit abortion training in state-run facilities, create a priority system for distributing family planning funds and allocate funds for family planning.
    • Fourteen states have introduced or passed and enacted bills prohibiting abortion coverage in insurance policies in the exchanges required to be set up under federal health care reform. The South Carolina bill would restrict abortion coverage in ALL private insurance packages. In Washington, however, a bill was passed in the state House of Representatives requiring insurers to cover abortion unless the purchaser opts out.
    • Eleven states introduced bills affecting medication abortions. In Indiana, the Senate “passed a measure that would require a physician to examine a patient in person before prescribing medication for abortion, effectively banning telemedicine.” The session adjourned before the bill progressed further.
    • Several states this year have introduced, passed or enacted bills setting a gestational age after which abortions may not be performed. The law is already on the books in seven states.
    Originally posted to Meteor Blades on Mon May 07, 2012 at 09:35 AM PDT.”

    My new mantra regarding women’s rights is to take back Susan Faludi’s term from the EARLY nineties and keep saying we are in a backlash.  Women continue to take two steps forward and what seems like three steps back.  My concern is that young women need to be at the forefront of this debate, this debacle.  I am reaching the age where birth control will no longer be a concern of mine (when did that happen?), yet while I work closely with college aged women every day, I am not sure they really understand the gravity of these attacks.  I am not sure they appreciate what the women before them did to give them reproductive freedom. 

    We need to keep these discussions going with young women.  Educate them.  Tell them what it use to be like.  We need women who were alive before Roe v Wade to tell the young women today how bad it was.  And we need to elect more women to office who will understand that making laws on the backs of women is just an old fashioned tradition that needs to end.  Today. 

    Bad Feminist!

    This week my dear friend, a second waver, we’ll call her, and I were talking about the way we judge women in our culture.  This conversation came up because I had just submitted a grant (cross your fingers!) that addresses the way that women are represented in the media. The focus of the grant is on raising awareness with young women that the messages they are sent, those very subtle messages, are deceiving.

    She wondered if some of this obsession women have with looks is cultural and she talked about how she wore make-up at different points in her life depending on where she lived.  Then we moved into a conversation on how easily we silently judge other women about what they wear, how they look, why they dress the way they do, and so on.  We talked about how so many young women today wax away EVERYTHING and do so in the name of “cleanliness.”

    I harp on this topic today because I wonder how we can break this so-called cycle.  As self-proclaimed feminists we are aware of the pressure to wax, paint our face, dress nice, yet as much as we fight against this pressure, we still bow to it, in many ways.  I wonder, is there a balance?  The documentary, Miss Representation, which I have written about previously features a gorgeous blond as filmmaker.  She briefly mentions her struggles as an actor being typecast as the dumb blond, but I feel like she just glosses over how she fits into this whole paradigm.

    I think, too, of some of my favorite movies, those produced in England and Holland, like Mike Leigh’s Secrets & Lies or Antonia’s Line.  Are these movies on my top ten because of the subject matter, the acting or the writing; or are these movies so good because the actors look like REAL people?  When you live in a culture, (the U.S.) where everything presented to you is “perfect” it is hard to see what reality is.  What is beauty when we only see it photo-shopped and touched up?  How can we find real beauty and reject the artificial?

    I know women who don’t wear make-up and tend to dress in a non-conformist way, but even they are conforming to some sort of “look” that fits into their world. I think of a good friend of mine, a former student, who has a unique style that reminds me somewhat of Ellen, the CoverGirl herself.

    I certainly don’t have an answer to this big issue on this rainy Wednesday in New England.  Perhaps I am thrown into these thoughts today as a teeter on the edge of PMS feeling bloated and fat, eagerly awaiting my period so this monthly slump will pass on.  Maybe its because I went to my bridesmaid dress fitting the other day for my sister’s wedding and felt huge in that oversize dress, literally four sizes more than I normally wear.  Maybe its because I fell down the stairs two weeks ago and my lower back is still aching and discouraging me from running.  Or maybe it’s just that the media-owned-conglomerate is plain old patriarchal and the only way to avoid it is to turn it off.

    Stop buying magazines that don’t feature REAL women.  Stop watching television that mis-represents us.  Only watch International films.  And when that woman walks by you wearing something you would not be caught dead in, say to yourself “you go girl” and let the judgment fade away.

    Do We Really Need Hundreds of Women’s Centers? Duh!

    One of my colleagues, who runs the University of Idaho Women’s Center, posted this article by Mark Perry, a professor and writer on economics and finance issues.  His main point is that since women are attending and graduating from college at higher rates than men than we don’t need campus based Women’s Centers. 

    Click here for article

    What is interesting about the article is that he cuts and pastes mission statements from five women’s centers who have main goals in promoting gender equity.  He disputes this by stating that if there are more women than men at a college, there is no need to promote gender equity.  Oh, Prof Perry, you just don’t get it!  Gender equity is not about filling the seats in the classroom.  Gender equity is about how girls and women are treated in our world, which in case you haven’t looked recently, ain’t so hot.  Shall I cite some examples as Perry did? 

    •  Women make less than men.  White women in the 77 cent range, Black Women in the 67 cent range and Latina women in the 57 cent range to a white man’s dollar.  
    • Over a billion women on the planet have been victimized by sexual violence.  One billion.
    • 17 out of 100 of our U.S. Senators are women.  17. 
    • Women hold only 3% of clout positions in the mainstream media (telecommunications, entertainment, publishing and advertising).
    • Women comprise 7% of directors and 13% of film writers in the top 250 grossing films.
    • The United States is 90th in the world in terms of women in national legislatures.
    • Women hold 17% of the seats in the House of Representatives (the equivalent body in Rwanda is 56.3% female).
    • Women are merely 3% of Fortune 500 CEOs.
    • About 25% of girls will experience teen dating violence.
    • The number of cosmetic surgical procedures performed on youth 18 or younger more than tripled from 1997 to 2007.
    • Among youth 18 and younger, liposuctions nearly quadrupled between 1997 and 2007 and breast augmentations increased nearly six-fold in the same 10-year period.
    • 65% of American women and girls report disordered eating behaviors. 

    I could spend much more time on this list.  In fact, feel free to add to it in your comments.  As, here in the U.S., we are actually debating whether women should have birth control covered by their health insurance.  We are being told by men in power that an aspirin between our knees is the best way to prevent pre-marital sex.  We live in a culture that actively promotes violence against women.  There is a backlash occurring against women as I write.  This is why, Professor Miller, we need Women’s Centers.  Why don’t you go write about something that actually is of concern instead of trashing women’s attempts at gender equity in a world that is anything but equitable. 

    Kettle One, Ladies Drink Vodka Too!

    Sometimes I think I should call this blog “what really gets my goat” instead of The Feminist Critic.  I was so overwhelmed with the “war against women” or “the fight to get the women’s vote” that I couldn’t focus on which of the latest attacks on women’s reproductive rights or dismissal of women’s opinions to address today. Hence I harken back to an advertisement that I see, far too often, often on the way to Boston, that drives me nuts. 

    Kettle One’s Latest Advertising

    I drink vodka.  I have for years.  It is my preferred liquor of choice.  Many of my female friends also drink vodka.  More of my female friends drink vodka than my male friends, many of whom prefer whiskey. Kettle One is my favorite vodka.  I will drink Grey Goose or Belvedere or some of the catchy new vodkas that are out there.  I will taste anything once.  But Kettle One is my favorite.  I have rich taste, I can’t help it.  

    However, Kettle One’s latest marketing campaign, directed by David O. Russell (Oscar nominated director of The Fighter), and featuring new music by Alberta Cross, which has been going on for far too long, includes three advertisements that include the following.  In every single one of these advertisements, the men are drinking vodka together like they are part of some Secret Society.  There is usually ONE woman shown with three men.  They are drinking vodka on the rocks.  The announcer always says “inspired by 300 years of tradition.”  And the end tag line is always “Gentlemen, this is vodka.”

    OK.  Really?  The subliminal statements in these ads make me want to boycott Kettle One.  “Inspired by 300 years of tradition” could mean patriarchy or some patriarchal tradition, some old men’s club that only allows women in if they are invited.  I’m sure that’s not what they meant, but since they don’t tell us what that mean, we are left to guess.  Is it inspired by 300 years of some old dudes pressing wheat?  Is that what tradition stands for? 

    I believe the male owned Nolet Distillery in Holland knows that women drink vodka.  They are trying to “reach out” to their male constituents and to reach men and let them know that vodka isn’t just a “girly” drink.  “Look, you can drink it on the rocks!”  No juice or sour mix!”  “It’s tough. It’s cool.  It’s Gentlemeny!”  But can’t we find marketing gurus in this day and age who can reach out to one group without stomping all over another?  Why should I watch that commercial and feel like I am not allowed to be in this vodka drinking Gentlemen’s club?  I feel the same way whenever I watch South Park.  All the commercials are about video games.  I watch South Park.  I think its funny and well-written, but I’m in my forties and I don’t play World of Warcraft or Halo. 

    In the advertising’s industry desperate struggle to reach men who don’t watch television or drink vodka, they do so on the backs of women either rendering us invisible, making us part of the scenery or overlooking us all together.  It’s as if we were never invited to the table or to the bar. 

    Supporting Women

    I’ve been wanting to write about women not supporting women but was trying to find a way to do so without cutting too close to home, so to speak.   Being one not to hold something in for an extensive amount of time, especially if it is really bugging me, here goes nothing! 

    This semester I have seen entitled and elitist behavior, by women, who call themselves feminists.  It’s shocking.  I talked with a close colleague about this and we discussed how this is so prevalent and troubling that it might be worthy of an article.  I am hesitant to recommend any of my students go into academia as a career.  Here I am, enjoying over 19 years of working with students and teaching in a public university, yet I would not recommend it.  Dog eat dog.  That pretty much sums it up.  And I recently talked with one of my alums who is in a Master’s program being chewed up and spit out by women who call themselves feminists in her women’s center. 

    For me, this boils down to how we practice our feminism.  We can say we are feminists and have a definition of what that might be or look like, but how we behave toward other women is an excellent test.  Ashley Judd recently wrote a great piece about body image and the media and asked us to try to be better at not judging each other.  http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/04/09/ashley-judd-slaps-media-in-the-face-for-speculation-over-her-puffy-appearance.html  So there’s one step.  But treating each other with respect no matter what our job titles are is the next step. 

    In the institution of higher education we exist in a caste system.  The support staff exist on the bottom, then the professional staff, than the faculty, than the administration.  But it’s really the faculty, I have found, that appreciate and perpetuate this system. 

    Some recent examples of entitlement in action (names removed of course to protect the not-so-innocent): 

    • A message left on my voice mail referring to one of the sweetest and nicest colleagues I have as a bitch 
    • Demanding water before a talk
    • Being annoyed that we were showing a borrowed film to a group of middle school girls during spring break

    I will stop there, because even one incident is too much.  What I have found is that the second you try to call someone out or confront their behavior they use the “ignorance is bliss” strategy and just don’t respond to you.  I have questioned the behavior of my colleagues and just not gotten a response.  It is so easy in this technological world of blogs, tweets, emails, and texts to simply ignore the text you do not want to deal with.  Hell, it’ll go away! 

    I thought I wanted to teach full time.  I loved teaching and this was why I spent almost $70,000 to get my doctorate.  I did this while working full time and teaching as an adjunct.  And then I spent the next six years applying for every job I believed I was qualified for in New England.  But a dear friend recently said to me after another rejection “You are not one of them. You’re nice.”  What does this mean for the institution of academia, the very place where we try to teach our students to not only be critical thinkers, but also to become engaged citizens of their world.  How can we demonstrate that practicing our feminism isn’t just talk but action? 

    You Can’t Be What You Can’t See

    We’ve been showing this documentary, Miss Representation, as part of our Women’s History Month program, our theme being Women Enacting Change.  While this movie certainly has it’s problems. like the fact that the majority of the celebrities who speak in it are gorgeous stereotypical women, it’s underlying theme of how we are represented in television, the movies and in the news is significant. View the trailer here http://www.missrepresentation.org/

    We hosted a showing of the movie in New Bedford as part of a collaboration with other women’s agencies to a packed house.  Then we showed it to a group of middle school girls for a day long empowerment event with the YWCA and the AAUW.  Lastly we showed the entire movie on campus for anyone on campus or in the community.  The group of about 50 people was made up mostly of community women.  Some of these were mothers who brought their daughters to see the movie.  These young women were riled up by the movie. 

    I asked them who in the audience identified as feminists and as some of them raised their hands, one girl said “I do now!”  This is my takeaway.  If one 90 minute film is going to help a middle school or high school girl identify with feminism then I need to show it everywhere.  I showed the movie to an 8th grade class the other day and while we were watching the clip, my college student who was there to help me lead the discussion whispered that she “feels that way too” in reference to women hating their bodies.  I let out a big internal sigh.  This woman already identifies with feminism and gets what the media is doing to us, but still can’t separate the message from the way it feels on the inside.  We need to start younger.

    This is my new plan of action:  take this movie to young women. 

    Here are just a few disturbing facts from the film.  

    • Women hold only 3% of clout positions in the mainstream media (telecommunications, entertainment, publishing and advertising).
    • Women comprise 7% of directors and 13% of film writers in the top 250 grossing films.
    • The United States is 90th in the world in terms of women in national legislatures.
    • Women hold 17% of the seats in the House of Representatives (the equivalent body in Rwanda is 56.3% female).
    • Women are merely 3% of Fortune 500 CEOs.
    • About 25% of girls will experience teen dating violence.
    • The number of cosmetic surgical procedures performed on youth 18 or younger more than tripled from 1997 to 2007.
    • Among youth 18 and younger, liposuctions nearly quadrupled between 1997 and 2007 and breast augmentations increased nearly six-fold in the same 10-year period.
    • 65% of American women and girls report disordered eating behaviors.

    I hope you will support me in my plan to take this movie to young girls in Southcoast Massachusetts and beyond.  With your energy being sent my way, I know we can change the way media controls our lives, one girl (and maybe even one boy?) at a time. 

    my feminist praxis

    critical reflections on my feminist praxis: activism, motherhood, and life

    The Feminist Critic

    Providing weekly critiques of theatre, film, books, politics and pop culture from a feminist perspective.